About the author Dr. CC

10 types of innovation at CArtLab Solutions

10 types of innovation at CArtLab Solutions

As a new member (and Fellow) at the incubator, accelerator, and hard tech ecosystem of mHub, I am faced daily with the question: “Have you done this before?” as a qualifying question from potential clients.

It’s only natural that someone would ask this question, as adults we have learned the importance of doing the thing 10, 50, or 100 times to become an expert at it.

However, in the context of research and innovation, there are processes, frameworks, and experiences through straight-up discomfort that differ from the more prescribed phases of product development.

This week at mHub, Mary Doctor led an engaging and insightful Book Club event on the topic of The Ten Faces of Innovation written by Tom Kelley, which describes 10 personas of innovation, all of which are represented at CArtLab Solutions.

The first group of personas are about using learning to innovate:

  1. Anthropologist: this role contributes through the fieldwork of observation, where CArtLab Solutions chooses clients who are open both to virtual and in-person interaction with a new idea/ material/ process/ product to ensure the problem is understood including all the subtle details
  2. Experimenter: this role involves leaving room for calculated risks and failing fast, where CArtLab Solutions approaches each project through a growth mindset, rather than results mindset
  3. Cross-Pollinator: this role involves buzzing around different flowers (disciplines) like bees, where Dr. CC at CArtLab Solutions uses her training in art conservation science to find creative approaches that solve other industry issues

The next group of personas unite around organization:

  1. Hurdler: this role understands that if something is truly fresh and new, it will involve obstacles that have deterred others, so CArtLab Solutions targets ambitious clients whose projects require perseverance and stubborn positive determination along the critical steps of development
  2. Collaborator: this role accepts that a team of perspectives is greater than any individual toward innovation, and at CArtLab Solutions we offer multidisciplinary combinations of eclectic problem solvers
  3. Director: This role is represented by various styles of leadership to spark positive change, whereas at CArtLab Solutions we dictate client alignment through calm and confident connections, even in the context of innovation challenges that appear frenzied

The final group of personas share the role of building:

  1. Experience Architect: this role opens up innovation with a radical mindset to turn a problem upside down/inside out, where at CArtLab Solutions we bring the motto “never say never” to every client meeting
  2. Set Designer: this role designs a stage for the team to do their best work, where at CArtLab Solutions we operate out of the physical environment of mHub due to the overlapping values of equity, sustainability, and community through respect
  3. Caregiver: this role breaks down the nature of the innovation teams interactions, where at CArtLab Solutions we see each client beyond the service we provide, to the individual who we can anticipate their current and future needs
  4. Storyteller: this role sees the significance of human experiences in translation of complex research or developments, where at CArtLab Solutions we like to understand the clients story during the intake process, to better contextualize all updates/ data/ results for the client

If my storytelling skills have not yet hit the mark for why you- my reader- should care about CArtLab Solutions approaches to innovation, please let the British publication of The Economistconvince you through their claim:

“Innovation is now recognized as the single most important ingredient in any modern economy.”

If you have any comments/questions/ concerns please do not hesitate to email me ccarta@cartlabsolutions.com.

Top 5 pain points where hiring a principal investigator is your best bet

Top 5 pain points where hiring a principal investigator is your best bet

What types of scenarios does someone hire a technical consultant/ P.I.?

In every work experience, there is always administrative responsibilites. Tasks that makes one wonder about our own contribution and it’s significance. Will an AI robot replace this worker’s role for this monotonous labor?

In contrast to repetitive administrative roles, the best job security is in the role of a principal investigator.

Why?

Work completed by a P.I. is ambitious, could be solved through multiple competing solutions, and most people would rather call it impossible based on a quick simulation then sit down to do the work of hurtling over the pain points to the best solution.

The top 5 pain points I recognize in potential clients are the following:

  1. Limited horsepower: Clients will want to keep their teams focused on current objectives while also moving the team forward, and can rely on a P.I. for quick onboarding, innovative solutions, and setting up project management plans for when the load lightens for the permanent team
  2. Confirmation Bias: Clients will feel their team has presented solutions that maintain status quo, and can rely on a P.I. to bring new ideas or solutions to challenges to the table
  3. Skills not currently in house: Clients will have a need that no in-house talent has the required skills, so they hire a P.I. with a specialized knowledge such as mine, like 3D printing, materials characterization of polymers, or polymer chemistry formulations, or lab expertise in designing a sustainable laboratory processes
  4. Politics/ emotions around a specific project: Clients will want to solve a problem, and will hire a P.I. to address the sensitive controversy without any negative impact on team dynamics
  5. Premature to invest full time in a specialized employee: Clients in this group are usually startups, looking for short term expertise by hiring a P.I.

Though my physical flexibility will never achieve a fraction of GOAT Simone Biles’ daily movement medicine, my mental flexibility as a principal investigator is constantly pushed to it’s limits while fulfilling the various needs of a variety of clients.

5 Black STEM Women Who Make Her-story

5 Black STEM Women Who Make Her-story

For Black History Month, who are you celebrating?

Please rounds of applause to ALL underrepresented women for graduating with STEM degrees in a system where these women receive only 12.4% masters degrees and 6.8% of doctoral degrees (NSF NCSES, 2019).

The first two black women I want to give all the snaps/props/claps/respect for being part of this dire her-story include women whom I studied alongside:

  1. Alyssa Bowker MA in biology from The College of William and Mary (2014), currently working at BIOIVT as a mergers and acquisitions analyst to elevate the life science project spaces with her high-level communication skills. She currently resides in Indiana, near where she grew up and where she believes her voice and vote can make the most social impact.
  2. Krystal Cunningham, Ph.D. in materials science and engineering from UCLA (2019) currently working at Raytheon as a Sr. MultiDisciplinary Engineer to create innovation with excellence thanks to her brilliant coding and characterization skills. She currently resides in California, far from her childhood in Jamacia, and where she recently authored a novel “STEM Century: It Takes a Village to Raise a 21st-Century Graduate” (amazon link)

MORE rounds of applause to black women in STEM her-story that inspire my journey:

3. Dr. Nola Hylton (1957- )– a femtech innovator and chemical engineer who grew up in New York, studied chemical engineering at MIT, and earned a PhD in applied physics from Stamford in 1985. She spent much of her career focused on inventing and detecting breast cancer biomarkers using mammography and MRI technology. She now serves at University of California San Francisco as a Professor of Radiology and Director of the Breast Imaging Research Group and saves the lives of women all around the world thanks to her scientific contributions.

4. Mary Elliot Hill (1908-1969)– one of the earliest black women to earn a masters degree in chemistry in 1941 from University of Pennsylvania. She was known as both an analytical and organic chemist who used UV spectrophotometry to track chemical reactions such as ketene synthesis. Her work understanding this polymerization process contributes to revolutionary applications in photolithography, medicinal chemistry, and next generation materials. She is a coauthor on over 40 publications, but never listed as a senior author on any of them despite her undoubtedly innovative and intellectual prowess.

5. Lyda Newman (~1885- ?)– a patented inventor of a synthetic bristled hairbrush who was the third black woman to obtain a US patent (#614,335, link here) and who did it at only 13 years old! She was born in Ohio and lived and worked as a hairstylist mostly in New York City and some summers in Newport, Rhode Island. Very little records exist on her life outside of her advertisements for work and her leadership roles in the New York City women’s suffragist movement. She registered for her right to vote in 1924 in NYC- yes 7 years after women earned this right in the USA- but her femtech invention impacts women with a variety of hair textures to this day (including this author’s Italian American thique hair over here)!

Please share awareness and give recognition to the MANY other black women in STEM who have contributed to our Her-story!

4 ways to think of Materials Science

4 ways to think of Materials Science

When we talk about human history, we refer to phases of innovation by material: The Stone Age, The Bronze Age, The Iron Age, and now.. The Plastic Age. As deemed in the Dustin Hoffman film “The Graduate”, “the future is plastics” but what does that mean for materials science and engineering?

Forgive me for a bit of a history lesson here, but it is important to understand that in the 21st century our world has formulated plastics at a rapid pace, inventing materials for war, for space, and for consumers. The first academic department to focus on these advanced materials was at Northwestern University (Chicago!) in 1955, and the first materials research society held a conference in 1973. Materials science and engineering is not only about understanding plastics, but it emphasizes 4 interconnected categories in the study of any material from plastics, to metals and ceramics.

These 4 important categories include:

  1. Processing: starting with raw materials to process ready materials through physical or chemical manipulation with theory of phase diagrams, diffusion, solubility parameters, and phase transformations Example: in the case of processing natural polymer resins such as those used as a varnish for protecting surfaces of paintings or furniture, the resin comes from a sap of a tree dammar which must be collected, crystallized, then dissolved into turpentine
  2. Structure: “zoom” down to the atomic structure and interatomic bonding for it’s impact on a materialExample: the intramolecular polymer chemistries can be fine tuned by manipulating variables in the polymerization reactor such as the catalyst, reaction time, comonomer, cooling flowrates, depending on the reaction type
  3. Properties: design for imperfections in solids, to improve known failure mechanisms, and for any specific type of end use property requiredExample: for dental appliances that are additive manufactured (3D printed) for end-use fitting, mechanical, spatial, and optical measurements are important to ensure quality to the patient
  4. Performance: design for end use requirements to ensure the materials are consistent from one product to the nextExample: for eyeglass lenses made with composite polymer materials, different production methods using chemical and energetic approaches target adhesion strength between layers, and antioxidations are added to maintain the color even as materials degrade through repeated exposure to humidity/heat cycles

Whether one is a materials scientist who develops and synthesizes new materials, and/or a materials engineer who creates new products/ systems with existing materials and/or developing new techniques for processing materials, the significance of the MSE skillset- processing, structure, properties, and performance- is imperative to our future.

It is up to us what materials we let define us, as we have been reinventing them since the stone age!

Fantasy, feminism, or fiction?

Fantasy, feminism, or fiction?

Bonnie Garmus’s text “Lessons and Chemistry” was a book I could not put down until I finished it. I related to the protoganist mainly because we both love to cook and to do research of chemistry.

The impetus to write my perspective comes in contrast to several reviews I have read on the novel.

To begin, I disagree vehemently with the critique in “The New Statesman” by Pippa Bailey who describes this novel as a “predictable…fantasy.”

As a chemist in 2024, I found the fullness and complexity of Elizabeth Zott’s character in the 1960s liberating, because Elizabeth may appear to be a strong woman on the outside- a single mom, with a full time research job and a masters degree- but inside, she is human- she needs love, support, and a job just like the rest of us. When she was at her most vulnerable after the sudden death of her soulmate (arguably), she demonstrated the agony I have felt when it feels like the world and its oppression will not cooperate with our plans and timeline. Nothing about the premature death of a partner is predictable, only an unfortunate reality some humans must face.

Another review I found inaccurate was published in the NYTimes by Elizabeth Egan, stating “feminism is the catalyst” of this novel.

My instinct was horror at the lack of feminism in Elizabeth’s decision not to continue her doctoral degree due to the environment created by her rapist at her university. Why did she not sue the university? Is it because it was the 1960s, a different time? Title 9 didn’t exist yet right? In an ideal world merit should be the only limiting factor in achieving honors in our society, or so I have been taught as a white, financially priviledged and educated female.

Thankfully I have been doing the work of unlearning, which is how I have come to learn that feminism as it is used commonly was created for white women with economic security. However, reading Bell Hook’s “Feminist Theory from margin to center” has helped me understand the limitations in describing the oppression faced by women of intersecting identities as it relates to financial and racial opportunity. Further reading of “A Renaissance of One’s Own” by Rachel Cargle reveals the complexity of intersectional feminism for a black woman in 2024.

Both the fictional character Elizabeth Zott in the 1960s and the real person Rachel Cargle in the early 2000s chose not to pursue their PhDs, even with both women having both merit and financial access to this education.

In both cases, these women have not felt safe to thrive within academia, so they have chosen a different path.

For Elizabeth, academia did not protect her from gender-based violence, and for Rachel, academia refused to protect her from intersectional gender-based and racial-based violence.

My takeaway from “Lessons in Chemistry” is that society forces women to choose between protecting themselves and achieving merit, leading to creative career solutions. The “straight and narrow path” to success is not accessible to everyone, depending on the intersectionality of their identity.

I was inspired to find my own creative career solution by starting my own technical consulting business, and I hope similar inspiration comes to other women with intersectional identities who read this inspirational fiction (that could easily be non-fiction) book.

5 Hats of a Principal Investigator

5 Hats of a Principal Investigator

What is a Principal Investigator (P.I.)?

In academia, the P.I. is the leader of a lab thus works to secure public grant funding, to recruite/mentor students, and to disseminate research, and of course must have a Ph.D.

Outside of academia, the role of P.I. can be held by anyone with at least a masters degree, but is not a term used regularly outside of the true crime genre of entertainment. Though I admire and respect the detective Carmen Sandeigo from early 90’s PC games, my lab coat, gloves, safety glasses, and safety shoes are quite a different look than one may imagine at first!

Using the P.I.’s academic and experiential knowledge, they are expert multitaskers, wearing several hats in various types of research experiments in multiple industries.

The top 5 of these hats include:

  1. Designer A P.I. uses their expert knowledge and research to form a hypothesis to solve a problem, then designs experiments (D.O.E.: design of experiments) that provide a clear answer to prove and/or disprove their hypothesis.
  2. PlannerA P.I. finds resources- funding, materials, equipment, other relevant experts- to plan out all the details related to their process of solving a problem.
  3. ExecuterA P.I. follows through with execution of research and/or development, ensuring that every statistically relevant test is completed, every funding source is tracked down, and the sample preparations are consistent with the DOE.
  4. Documenter: A P.I. knows there is no such thing as too much data (esp now in the age of AI), and will document every little pertinent detail that is useful to their hypothesis and experiments, such as the time of day/temperature/humidity of the moment doing a specific measurement.
  5. Interpreter: A P.I. will process data and utilize various software, mathematical tools, or automation tools to interprete the results to form a conclusion and finally to advise other stakeholders on the next steps.

For complex research projects, trust a Principal Investigator (P.I.) to excel in solving your problems!

See on LinkedIn

Breakdown of the name “CArtLab Solutions”

Breakdown of the name “CArtLab Solutions”

Back when I was on my search for the “right” college/university experience, I would get a range of responses to that initial survey each admissions office would have us all fill out with our experiences and interests.

“Oh, you wrote both art and chemistry! Can you talk about that?”

My interest was not obvious to academics then, nor is my expertise obvious to most people now, so let’s break it down!

Traditionally art and science are seen as polar opposites- each using different sides of one’s brain. When I would study both topics in the same day in college, I would find my brain would physically be strained from the unique effort. At CArtLab Solutions, the art studio and the chemistry or engineering lab are treated as equally important toward achieving an outcome.

Both disciplines of art and science require an understanding of principles, which are then applied in a creative way to innovate.

Before entering either the studio or the lab, there is a certain amount of ideation that needs to take place.

  • What medium(s) or material(s) do I want to use?
  • What safety must be in place to do this work?
  • What training is necessary for me to use certain tools?
  • What is my hypothesis of how the process will guide me through the project goal(s)?

Both the art studio and the science lab are places of intense productivity and experimentation that are revisited repetitively. In the lab or the art studio, a person becomes an expert by doing something 100+ times. During this phase, one can lose track of time getting into the details of subtasks:

  • Mixing a gesso or size to prime a canvas for painting
  • Grinding down a pigment to bring out a hue
  • Mixing paint colors to achieve a specific contrast/ complimentary style
  • Making stock solutions for specific reaction chemistries
  • Measuring micro-samples for analysis
  • Preparing sample surfaces with energy to prepare for subsequent layer additions like coatings

The vision behind CArtLab Solutions is to create equitable innovation, which stems from respecting both the art and the science of problem solving.

See on LinkedIn